2017 Stallion Fees - Changes?

Post Reply
Horsebagger
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:20 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:05 am

Admin wrote:
Horsebagger wrote:I personally can't get a feel yet on where this stallion's fee gets set when all is said and done. Lot's of variables I'm not privy to that will go into the equation.

-I don't think they likely had to pay a lot to acquire the horse to begin with, so there's not a big number out there to recoup through stallion fees. Acquisition recovery is almost always the primary objective in setting a first year fee, imo.

-How much does the windfall in racing purse winnings off set the profit? Often (like American Pharoah) the breeder wasn't in the waterfall of racing profits like we have here. So does Taylor Made focus on making this horse a long term stallion play and price him affordably or try to maximize profits immediately in years 1-2 by throwing out a big fee target and negotiate off of any interest at that level?

-How many mares are lined up through Taylor Made's client's and now China Horse Club to go to him initially? The more committed, the more likely they push the fee higher. My instincts tell me that they have some, but not an overwhelming number, even though TM is primarily a broodmare farm. Since UBS passed, they haven't had a high priced stallion in their shed they needed to support. Are those mares still there and those owners committed to this stallion at whatever fee?

-Although he's coming with a pretty damn impressive racing record, his bloodlines are still what they are. Pulpit sire line is quality, but the dam side will always be a problem in recruiting mares, imo. If his dam was quality, why was she in California breeding to Lucky Pulpit?

So in making an educated guess, i'll cast a wide net and say he could be anywhere between $100,000 and $200,000 ('wow, thanks HB') and say $125,000 as a target over/under ('you're welcome').

Interested to hear other's thoughts.

Side note....I'll add Medaglia D'oro to the list of current stallions in line for a bump above the $150,000. To at least $175,000, maybe $200,000. He'll still get a full book of quality mares at that number.

And add Street Sense to the list of those getting lowered.
Wow, HB. I can't imagine CC filling a book at dime more than $50k. Even at that price, I wouldn't be one looking to breed to him. Excellent racehorse, but that pedigree is going to make a lot of Breeders want him to prove himself now as a stallion before they'll breed to him.
You are right. I had my mea culpa moment. Instead of riffing off the top of my head, I should have reached out first. Doing so afterwards, I realized I was way-off and admitted it, and agree that there's no way we'd even send a top mare to him at anywhere close to six figures. Waste of a season until proven.

Indirect word I got is $30,000 - $50,000 IF he goes to the shed this winter which makes a lot more sense than the opinion of yours truly.
Somnambulist

Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:16 am

Shame on you!

Too bad crazy fandom doesn't influence fee.
User avatar
Insane Crazy
Posts: 3045
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 11:26 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:19 am

Treve wrote:We think alike haha I was shocked at six figures as well and was thinking while his "fair" price would be in the 30-40k range, they'd probably attempt 50-60k hot off the presses if he wins the BCC and Pegasus. The "smart" price would be 15-35k.
15k seems low awfully to me (from the stud farm's perspective), but I bet lots of nice mares might take a risk at that price. He's unproven, but that accounts for a certain amount of value as well -- sure, he could be a dud, but he COULD be the next wacky surprise superstar.

I love this time of year, TBH. Any time I can sit and observe in-depth analysis about the cost of one breeding to a pretty pony is a good one. :D

@Som: Honestly, the fandom is so alarming at points that as a stud owner I'd consider giving a discount to mare owners. You never know when someone's gonna try to kidnap their superstar horse's baby...
Not a wholesome trottin' race, no, but a race where they sit down right on the horse!
Like to see some stuck-up jockey boy sittin' on Dan Patch? Make your blood boil? Well, I should say!
User avatar
Treve
Posts: 4699
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 5:12 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:21 am

Somnambulist wrote:Shame on you!

Too bad crazy fandom doesn't influence fee.
:lol:
Can you imagine the headline though?
"Notorious 'Chromie' wins the Powerball!
intends to buy 50 mares at fingerlakes and send them to 'the Champ' "
A filly named Ruffian...

Eine Stute namens Danedream...

Une pouliche se nommant Trêve...

Kincsem nevű kanca...


And a Queen named Beholder
User avatar
Treve
Posts: 4699
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 5:12 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:33 am

Insane Crazy wrote:
Treve wrote:We think alike haha I was shocked at six figures as well and was thinking while his "fair" price would be in the 30-40k range, they'd probably attempt 50-60k hot off the presses if he wins the BCC and Pegasus. The "smart" price would be 15-35k.
15k seems low awfully to me (from the stud farm's perspective), but I bet lots of nice mares might take a risk at that price. He's unproven, but that accounts for a certain amount of value as well -- sure, he could be a dud, but he COULD be the next wacky surprise superstar.

I love this time of year, TBH. Any time I can sit and observe in-depth analysis about the cost of one breeding to a pretty pony is a good one. :D

@Som: Honestly, the fandom is so alarming at points that as a stud owner I'd consider giving a discount to mare owners. You never know when someone's gonna try to kidnap their superstar horse's baby...
Yep it's really low and wouldn't be a 'fair' valuation of the horse but it could be clever to get some nice mares, for the owners who might then feel they're not going to 'waste' a season or risk losing a ton of money. He could also end up getting a lot more support from California breeders too. Like be honest... who you gonna send your mare to for a Cal Bred, Lucky Pulpit or CC if you have 30k to spend :lol: There is a chance they could at least recoup their investment on first crop yearlings and then some if they're attractive. If TM has already recouped their investment on him in earnings then they don't need a high fee per se. New shareholders might pressure it up higher but...

I am not a breeder or a stud farm manager but from someone looking in I feel a clever approach could be: relatively modest starting fee first year - modest or high increase second year depending on interest in the first season - remain steady even if interest is high and the weanlings are attractive - boost when the first yearling hit the sales. And of course, 2yo performance will determine the rest.
A filly named Ruffian...

Eine Stute namens Danedream...

Une pouliche se nommant Trêve...

Kincsem nevű kanca...


And a Queen named Beholder
User avatar
bare it all
Posts: 1206
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:21 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:24 pm

I could see the Chrome stud fee be a rare opportunity for an outside mare owner to have some say in what price they'll pay for him. Say you have your nice stakes mare or stakes producer and you what to take a chance on Chrome. Do you think TM would be willing to be a little more negotiable for the right mares?
Mel Mae
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:24 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:55 pm

Taylor Made released the fees for everyone but Chrome today. Mshawish is the top dog (until Chrome) at $20,000.
Admin
Posts: 1828
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:35 pm

Tue Oct 25, 2016 9:35 pm

HB, I saw your later post after I'd posted, but then I had to run.

Regarding the convo about a really low fee, I'd disagree. It can have the opposite impact than stated here. That would discourage those who have the nicer mares, and encourage those with lesser mares. You aim for the sweet spot. A more "respectable" stud fee makes the stallion seem more desirable. A low fee seems the opposite.

We do this in all areas of life, equating quality with price.
"This is how we roll in the Shire." -- Leonard
User avatar
Treve
Posts: 4699
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 5:12 pm

Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:06 pm

Admin wrote:HB, I saw your later post after I'd posted, but then I had to run.

Regarding the convo about a really low fee, I'd disagree. It can have the opposite impact than stated here. That would discourage those who have the nicer mares, and encourage those with lesser mares. You aim for the sweet spot. A more "respectable" stud fee makes the stallion seem more desirable. A low fee seems the opposite.

We do this in all areas of life, equating quality with price.
So what would be the sweet spot in your opinion?
A filly named Ruffian...

Eine Stute namens Danedream...

Une pouliche se nommant Trêve...

Kincsem nevű kanca...


And a Queen named Beholder
halo
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:25 pm

Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:24 pm

Mel Mae wrote:Curlin started at $75,000 in 2009 then was at $25,000 after his first crop of 2-year-olds (who obviously didn't do too hot). He stayed there until 2015 when he went up to $35,000 (and is now at $100k at a different farm).
Actually, in the early months of 2014, they were booking Curlin at $15,000. They stopped that mid breeding season when the little Curlins started to pop.
Mel Mae
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:24 pm

Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:26 pm

halo wrote:
Mel Mae wrote:Curlin started at $75,000 in 2009 then was at $25,000 after his first crop of 2-year-olds (who obviously didn't do too hot). He stayed there until 2015 when he went up to $35,000 (and is now at $100k at a different farm).
Actually, in the early months of 2014, they were booking Curlin at $15,000. They stopped that mid breeding season when the little Curlins started to pop.
Good to know, I was just going off of the advertised fees. Didn't dig any deeper than that.
Admin
Posts: 1828
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:35 pm

Wed Oct 26, 2016 6:06 pm

Treve wrote:
Admin wrote:HB, I saw your later post after I'd posted, but then I had to run.

Regarding the convo about a really low fee, I'd disagree. It can have the opposite impact than stated here. That would discourage those who have the nicer mares, and encourage those with lesser mares. You aim for the sweet spot. A more "respectable" stud fee makes the stallion seem more desirable. A low fee seems the opposite.

We do this in all areas of life, equating quality with price.
So what would be the sweet spot in your opinion?
I think $50k. It's respectable while not scaring anyone off.
"This is how we roll in the Shire." -- Leonard
User avatar
Diver52
Posts: 3396
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:44 pm
Location: Redlands, CA

Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:23 pm

I'm guessing Lucky Pulpit began to get better mares (to the extent California has them) once CC began to excel. If he puts out stronger results, would that prop up Chrome?
I ran marathons. I saw the Taj Mahal by Moonlight. I drove Highway 1 in a convertible. I petted Zenyatta.
Horsebagger
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:20 pm

Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:27 pm

Did Spendthrift announce their 2017 fees publicly, yet? Their website is showing Malibu Moon down to $75,000 and Into Mischief up to $75,000.
User avatar
Treve
Posts: 4699
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 5:12 pm

Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:39 pm

Diver52 wrote:I'm guessing Lucky Pulpit began to get better mares (to the extent California has them) once CC began to excel. If he puts out stronger results, would that prop up Chrome?
Well seeing as his fee went up 5500$ since he was bred to Love the Chase... I would think if he was actually able to get six figure earners (that didn't take 30 starts to get there), yes it would prop him up a bit.
But I think it's going to take an other freak, or an actual string of Blacktype maybe even Graded stakes runners for it to really impact CC I'd think.
A filly named Ruffian...

Eine Stute namens Danedream...

Une pouliche se nommant Trêve...

Kincsem nevű kanca...


And a Queen named Beholder
Vandalay
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:17 pm

Fri Oct 28, 2016 10:35 am

Anyone want to take a guess on Ashford's 2017 fees?

I'm thinking Munnings will get a modest increase,..Not sure about Looking at lucky

Stay Thirsty should also get an increase,..

Uncle Mo?...I'm thinking he's at LEAST $100K,...probably $150K

Anyone else?
Horsebagger
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:20 pm

Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:50 pm

I'll take a shot (for what it's worth)

Declaration of War - slightly up
Stay Thirsty - slightly up
Giants Causeway - definitely down
Uncle Mo - WAYYYY up to 175,000, maybe 200,000
Munnings - up to 35,000 - 50,000
Shanghai Bobby - maybe slightly up
Tale of the Cat - down
Fu- Peg - Should be $5,000 if they don't sell him to a regional farm. He only covered 32 mares at $7,500 in KY. Wouldn't he get well over 50 mares in NY?
Horsebagger
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:20 pm

Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:02 pm

Lane's End is a little tougher because they (in my view) always prefer to keep fees affordable to keep books full of quality mares.

But Candy Ride should be going up to between 75 and 100k, as well as The Factor and Union Rags getting smaller bumps
User avatar
Flanders
Posts: 9979
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:01 pm

Fri Oct 28, 2016 1:59 pm

Horsebagger wrote:Fu- Peg - Should be $5,000 if they don't sell him to a regional farm. He only covered 32 mares at $7,500 in KY. Wouldn't he get well over 50 mares in NY?
This is the 4th or 5th year in a row that his mares bred is in the 30s. It amazes me that he stays there. I wonder if something in his contract when he was bought from Sekiguchi prevented his sale or moving? Because I can't come up with any other reason he would still be there. They have never been sentimental about a horse before.
Somnambulist

Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:29 pm

Flanders wrote:
Horsebagger wrote:Fu- Peg - Should be $5,000 if they don't sell him to a regional farm. He only covered 32 mares at $7,500 in KY. Wouldn't he get well over 50 mares in NY?
This is the 4th or 5th year in a row that his mares bred is in the 30s. It amazes me that he stays there. I wonder if something in his contract when he was bought from Sekiguchi prevented his sale or moving? Because I can't come up with any other reason he would still be there. They have never been sentimental about a horse before.
Literally was about to post similar.
Post Reply