revised HISA rules finally approved

[Flanders]

This includes the update of "if a horse receives an intra-articular injection of corticosteroids they are automatically on the vet list for 30 days". The new rules go into effect on July 1st.

https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/f ... -changes/

the pdfs with the changes are linked at the above. It was too much for me to read.

[sweettalk]

This includes the update of "if a horse receives an intra-articular injection of corticosteroids they are automatically on the vet list for 30 days". The new rules go into effect on July 1st.

https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/f ... -changes/

the pdfs with the changes are linked at the above. It was too much for me to read.

praise be.

[HB1994]

This is great news.

Supreme Court rejects challenge to new horse racing anti-doping rules

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge from Republican-controlled states to a horse racing safety law that has led to national medication and anti-doping rules.

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-cour ... f0c0c9023f

[Flanders]

This is great news.

Supreme Court rejects challenge to new horse racing anti-doping rules

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge from Republican-controlled states to a horse racing safety law that has led to national medication and anti-doping rules.

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-cour ... f0c0c9023f

Does this mean the states that don't allow HISA have to allow HISA now?

[HB1994]

It doesn’t sound like it? From the Paulick Report:

The immediate legal impact of the Supreme Court’s action today is unclear. Because the Sixth Circuit had upheld HISA, the federal law is already in operation in the states within that circuit’s jurisdiction. Nothing changes. And because the justices in Washington did not offer a substantive ruling on the law, the states where HISA has been put on hold because of pending constitutional challenges won’t automatically have to embrace HISA. So nothing changes there, either. But there is no doubt that this Sixth Circuit case represented the best chance for anti-HISA forces to get a win at the Supreme Court. And there is no reason why HISA officials cannot cite this Supreme Court action every time an industry opponent now tries to claim the law is invalid.

https://paulickreport.com/features/keep ... ge-to-hisa

[Flanders]

It doesn’t sound like it? From the Paulick Report:

The immediate legal impact of the Supreme Court’s action today is unclear. Because the Sixth Circuit had upheld HISA, the federal law is already in operation in the states within that circuit’s jurisdiction. Nothing changes. And because the justices in Washington did not offer a substantive ruling on the law, the states where HISA has been put on hold because of pending constitutional challenges won’t automatically have to embrace HISA. So nothing changes there, either. But there is no doubt that this Sixth Circuit case represented the best chance for anti-HISA forces to get a win at the Supreme Court. And there is no reason why HISA officials cannot cite this Supreme Court action every time an industry opponent now tries to claim the law is invalid.

https://paulickreport.com/features/keep ... ge-to-hisa

Yeah 5th Circuit did this crap, like they always do. I'm not talking politics nor do I want to, but that is how I see it and can't change my mind. So Texas and Louisiana get to keep doing whatever and don't have to follow HISA for probably years until the Supreme Court takes up the case since its a split between 5th and 6th circuit.

https://paulickreport.com/features/keep ... th-circuit