How have Derby winners done as sires?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:12 am
Join our forum and message boards to talk about thoroughbred horse racing in America, handicap races and more
https://horse-racing-forum.com/forum/
https://horse-racing-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3562
They were only unfashionable because they couldn't consistently sire good foals. They all got a chance in Kentucky, some longer than others. They all got at least some decent mares during their first couple years at stud. I couldn't name more than a few of each stallions foals though and I've followed racing closely through most of their careers.swale1984 wrote:All of that talk makes me wonder what could've been if Swale hadn't died. Slew was a sire of sires, for sure, and it would've been interesting to see how Swale would've done.
Also sad to see how many good horses were too "unfashionable" to stay in Kentucky. Most of my faves (Sunny's Halo, Go for Gin, Alysheba, Silver Charm, and Smarty Jones) fall into that category.
i like looking for many of those stallions as broodmare sires. Most of the had the potential to be large heart carriers at the least, so their daughters should be producing some decent offspring. It's a shame they didn't replicate their successes in their foals, though.Flanders wrote: They were only unfashionable because they couldn't consistently sire good foals. They all got a chance in Kentucky, some longer than others. They all got at least some decent mares during their first couple years at stud. I couldn't name more than a few of each stallions foals though and I've followed racing closely through most of their careers.